His Master’s Voice is known as a record label, an international music retail chain, but above all for its legendary logo featuring a dog and a gramophone—a visual that has become iconic in representing sound recordings and the music industry. His Master’s Voice is a registered trademark. Talisman Brands Inc. opposed the application for a European figurative mark that strongly seems to resemble the classic logo - can we talk of a likelihood of confusion?

You probably know Logan Paul from the wrestling ring, YouTube or his podcast. This time, though, he aimed for a knockout not in sports—but in court—to defend his brand, PRIME Hydration. His opponent? None other than global football icon Lionel Messi. PRIME Hydration is accusing Más+ of copying its packaging design. Is there a likelihood of confusion?

You proudly showcase your new product online. Everyone can see what a beautiful creation it is. Then it hits you: I need to register it as a design to prevent someone else from copying it. A design registration in the European Union requires two things: the design must have individual character and be new. When it comes to the novelty requirement, unfortunately, you can be your own worst enemy: did you already disclose the design to the public before filing? If so, your design might no longer qualify for registration.

The figurative trademark application featuring a portrait of Maradona, complete with his signature and full name, is refused. The mark is found to immediately evoke an association with the legendary footballer and the earlier MARADONA mark.

But does the same apply to a silhouette of a footballer wearing number 10 – the jersey number Maradona famously wore throughout most of his career? Unlike the first, this trademark contains no textual reference to MARADONA, only a visual hint at who the player might be.

A Spanish applicant filed for the EU word mark VISION PRO. Apple based its opposition based on likelihood of confusion with its Vision Pro trademark — known for its VR headset with a built-in 3D camera. Read more about the Opposition Decision here, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the specific goods and services for which you register a trademark.

In January 2024, a Chinese company from Shenzhen filed a trademark application for a logo that looked suspiciously similar to IKEA's—the only difference being the word ‘IKIKI’ instead of IKEA. IKEA filed an opposition, which we talked about in our previous blogpost here. Now, the EUIPO has come to a decision.

A German applicant filed a trademark application for GAME OF DONER for fast-food services. Home Box Office (HBO) opposed the application based on its well-known trademark GAME OF THRONES. Does GAME OF DONER unfairly take advantage of GAME OF THRONES?

Mysteryland is one of the oldest festivals in the Netherlands and has a rich history. Merchandise is an important source of income for festivals. A German individual filed a trademark application for MYSTICLAND in the EU, covering products like CDs. Mysteryland filed an opposition, based on a risk of confusion.

LEGO is undoubtedly an iconic brand for both young and old. In addition to design rights on the LEGO brick itself, LEGO also holds design rights on the LEGO minifigure as well as trademark rights on its classic shape. Not surprisingly, the toy manufacturer filed several applications for the cancellation of toy figure design registrations of third parties over the past years.

A perfume bottle, besides the fragrance and the brand it holds, is often a work of art in itself. The flasks are often so distinctive that the brand can be recognised by the bottle’s shape. Chanel recently filed an opposition against Romanian perfume brand CHAOS’ application of the 3D shape of their latest fragrance, because of the close resemblance to the Chanel No. 5 bottle.

When choosing a trademark for your products and/or services, you typically go for one that is distinctive and appealing. You aim to go for an attractive trademark, because you want to sell your product or service. However, you could also opt for an ugly one. It doesn’t happen often, but it would certainly be distinctive. Or wouldn’t it be?

Trademarks must not violate public order or principles of morality. Trademarks that are racist, offensive, or unacceptable for any other reason will be refused. This is a broad standard, often shaped by cultural differences. Recently, the Benelux office intervened with the trademark "WHITE ONLY" for a nightclub. Offensive?

The use of AI, such as ChatGPT, has become indispensable across various professions. The legal sector is no exception, with AI increasingly making its way into legal proceedings. But is it wise to rely on an AI tool for legal representation? Let’s take a closer look at a case in the Benelux where AI played a role in a trademark opposition procedure.

One moment, a municipality proudly unveils its new logo; the next, it faces accusations of plagiarism. This recently happened to the municipality of Urk in The Netherlands. Their new logo features a stylized "U," outlined and rendered in two shades of blue. Controversy quickly arose, as the design was said to closely resemble the logo of the municipality of Terneuzen—a similarly outlined letter, in this case, a "T," also featuring various shades of blue.

Louis Vuitton is globally recognized for its iconic pattern, but the name itself is also a widely known trademark. It is common for brands to register the abbreviation of their brand name. Louis Vuitton also registered 'L.V,' an abbreviation frequently seen on their bags and clothing. This registration proved useful, as Louis Vuitton recently had to take action against a Finnish company that filed a European application for the word mark 'LV' for cleaning products. Is there a risk of confusion?

Lovin’ it – sounds familiar? You’re probably thinking of McDonald’s, but interestingly, it wasn’t McDonald’s that filed this slogan as a trademark in the European Union. A Greek company applied for this figurative mark for chocolate beverages. McDonald’s, well-known for its slogan “I’M LOVIN’ IT!”, filed an opposition against the application. Does the Greek company stand a chance?

Marlboro's opposition against the European trademark application of Gold Mikaello: the Gold Mikaello cigarette pack stands out because it replicates several key elements of Marlboro's iconic design. Does Gold Mikaello likely gain an unfair advantage by leveraging Marlboro's established reputation in the tobacco industry?

Though in first instance the EUIPO accepted the oval shape with blue and yellow from Chiquita as a logo, Compagnie Financière de Participation challenged the validity of the mark. Compagnie argued that the logo lacked distinctive character, as oval labels and the color scheme are commonly used in the sector of bananas.